|
|
Basics
OMG ADS!
Archives
January 2009
December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 |
Sunday, 25 January
In her exploration of feminism v. domesticity, Miki observes "work no longer underwrites our identities--consumption does". Like many of us who are feminists, yet love home life as well, Miki is asking if the two are mutually exclusive. Are we victims of another media blitz to convince women that the home is where they belong, ala post-WWII? Are those pesky feminists being sold a vision of domesticity in hopes they'll leave the workplace alone? While I certainly do see a media slant pushing women toward the "home lifestyle", I do not believe home and feminism are in conflict. While mainstream feminism was indeed very much about work, I always considered it to be about choice, preferably for both sexes. This expansion of choice is something I strive for in my personal life, and the products of my home (see below) are created in equal portions by me and my husband. Regarding consumerism, another interesting question is asked: if advertising has made us believe that our home is the result of the things we buy for it, then "how do we make the home a site of production, rather than commodification?" First, we must decide on the product of the home. Miki says, beautifully: "here is love, whether you've earned it or not. Here are pleasures that have no price. And here is an identity you produce rather than purchase." To please my analytical mind, I prefer tangibles: yet the only tangible I can come up with is health, though the intangibles of safety and comfort are very important as well. From that point, seeing the home from the perspective of production is easy. Health is provided through cleanliness and good food. Comfort and safety are also about cleanliness, in addition to decor, and the activities that occur within the home. Of all these aspects, only one--decor--is clearly tied with consumerism. Yes, you can buy the newest gadget to dust with greater ease, and you can squirrel away six sets of dishes for entertaining, but these are hardly necessary. Any consumerism is clearly an individual choice. Perhaps, then, domestic feminism is about making conscious choices about what and how we consume lifestyle items, and who participates in creating the products of the home.
~Living~ | Cat Connor | 25 Jan, 2004
Comments |
|
|
|
||